<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<tt xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2006/04/ttaf1"
      xmlns:tts="http://www.w3.org/2006/04/ttaf1#styling" xml:lang="en">
  <head>
    <styling>
      <style id="defaultSpeaker" tts:fontSize="12px" tts:fontFamily="SansSerif" tts:fontWeight="normal" tts:fontStyle="normal" tts:textDecoration="none" tts:color="white" tts:backgroundColor="black" tts:textAlign="left" />
      <style id="defaultCaption" tts:fontSize="12px" tts:fontFamily="SansSerif" tts:fontWeight="normal" tts:fontStyle="normal" tts:textDecoration="none" tts:color="white" tts:backgroundColor="black" tts:textAlign="left" />
    </styling>
  </head>
  <body id="thebody" style="defaultCaption">
    <div xml:lang="en">
      <p begin="0:00:14.64" end="0:00:21.07">Ken Hudnut: Cajon Pass is the lowest point between Los <br/>Angeles and the rest of the nation. So historically,</p>
      <p begin="0:00:21.07" end="0:00:26.57">going way back to the days of the pioneers coming <br/>through in wagon trains through here, this was the low</p>
      <p begin="0:00:26.57" end="0:00:32.15">point. And so over the years, old Route 66 came <br/>through here and one lifeline after another got</p>
      <p begin="0:00:32.15" end="0:00:34.98">stacked in right through Cajon Pass.</p>
      <p begin="0:00:34.98" end="0:00:43.99">So now we have all of the telecom fiber-optic infrastructure, <br/>half a dozen high-tension power transmission lines, the</p>
      <p begin="0:00:43.99" end="0:00:50.57">I-15 freeway, 2 high-pressure gas lines, and 2 gasoline <br/>fuel lines all coming through Cajon Pass where it crosses</p>
      <p begin="0:00:50.57" end="0:00:54.13">the San Andreas Fault.</p>
      <p begin="0:00:54.13" end="0:01:00.25">The rupture propagation is one of the things that we're <br/>studying. That's what creates the big shockwave off the</p>
      <p begin="0:01:00.25" end="0:01:02.43">front of the rupture.</p>
      <p begin="0:01:02.43" end="0:01:08.95">So the ground motions through here would also be very large. <br/>Things would get knocked down as well as broken. And then,</p>
      <p begin="0:01:08.95" end="0:01:16.75">a lot of that energy gets channeled out into the Los Angeles <br/>Basin and then also out to the northwest towards Bakersfield.</p>
      <p begin="0:01:16.75" end="0:01:22.71">So according to this scenario, what would happen to things <br/>like the freeway or the rail lines or maybe the gasoline</p>
      <p begin="0:01:22.71" end="0:01:25.67">and natural gas lines you mentioned?</p>
      <p begin="0:01:25.67" end="0:01:29.11">First, the rupture would break one of the high-pressure gas <br/>lines that's just on the opposite side of the freeway from</p>
      <p begin="0:01:29.11" end="0:01:35.89">here. Then it would break through the freeway offsetting one <br/>lane of traffic on each side. It would then rupture through</p>
      <p begin="0:01:35.89" end="0:01:44.19">old Route 66 where all of the telecommunication fiber-optic <br/>lines are buried and then across through both of these straight</p>
      <p begin="0:01:44.19" end="0:01:47.73">lines that connect the ports of L.A. and Long Beach to the <br/>rest of the country.</p>
      <p begin="0:01:47.73" end="0:01:53.69">It would then keep breaking, go through the power lines and <br/>rupture another gas pipeline and then the two gasoline lines</p>
      <p begin="0:01:53.69" end="0:02:01.59">and where that happens, normally the ground current through <br/>that pipeline, that would be broken and you'd get an arc and</p>
      <p begin="0:02:01.59" end="0:02:07.47">so the gasoline would ignite and when actually having this <br/>scenario that you'd have an explosion forming a crater, right</p>
      <p begin="0:02:07.47" end="0:02:13.45">where it's co-incident with 2 of the really big power lines <br/>across the fault. So that's just over here. This is not the</p>
      <p begin="0:02:13.45" end="0:02:21.25">place you want to be when the big one actually hits. <br/>We created an earthquake scenario that involves rupture of</p>
      <p begin="0:02:21.25" end="0:02:26.91">the part of the southern San Andreas Fault that we are most <br/>concerned about. It has a recurrence interval of about 150</p>
      <p begin="0:02:26.91" end="0:02:31.58">years and yet it's been more than 300 years since <br/>the last big earthquake.</p>
      <p begin="0:02:31.58" end="0:02:36.84">So we know that that section of the fault is really <br/>locked and loaded, ready to go. And this scenario starts</p>
      <p begin="0:02:36.84" end="0:02:43.11">down there near the Salton Sea, ruptures pass Palm Springs <br/>and then passed us here Cajon Pass and keeps going up to</p>
      <p begin="0:02:43.11" end="0:02:50.61">Lake Hughes. It's a 180-mile section of the fault, 300 <br/>kilometers long. It's the part that we're almost concerned</p>
      <p begin="0:02:50.61" end="0:02:54.59">about rupturing in the next great earthquake on the San Andreas Fault.</p>
      <p begin="0:02:54.59" end="0:03:00.94">It's not to say that this exact earthquake would ever happen. <br/>We're just putting together as best we can a realistic scenario.</p>
      <p begin="0:03:00.94" end="0:03:08.94">So in this case, we've said it would be a <br/>magnitude 7.8. We based that on the fact that the 1857</p>
      <p begin="0:03:08.94" end="0:03:15.02">Fort Tejon earthquake and also the 1906 San Francisco <br/>earthquake. Both of those San Andreas great earthquakes</p>
      <p begin="0:03:15.02" end="0:03:22.90">were 7.8-7.9. So we wanted to go with that number because we <br/>know that can happen. We also think it's possible that the</p>
      <p begin="0:03:22.90" end="0:03:30.30">San Andreas Fault could even dish out a bigger earthquake <br/>than that. So this is actually not a worst-case scenario.</p>
      <p begin="0:03:30.30" end="0:03:37.19">So, we based the ShakeOut Scenario Earthquake as a starting <br/>point on an earthquake that's actually one of the earthquakes</p>
      <p begin="0:03:37.19" end="0:03:45.07">that's thought to be quite plausible. It's within the National <br/>Seismic Hazard Maps. So that earthquake is one of thousands</p>
      <p begin="0:03:45.07" end="0:03:50.40">that form the basis for the National Seismic Hazard Maps. <br/>So it's generally considered that an earthquake of this</p>
      <p begin="0:03:50.40" end="0:03:56.42">size on this part of the fault is quite realistic. <br/>And a 7.8 earthquake is one that we think that this</p>
      <p begin="0:03:56.42" end="0:04:00.98">section in the San Andreas Fault is certainly capable of.</p>
      <p begin="0:04:00.98" end="0:04:08.47">We are also trying to reach a level that was about like <br/>the level of say Hurricane Katrina that we are asked to</p>
      <p begin="0:04:08.47" end="0:04:15.35">try to sort of tune it to about that magnitude. And we <br/>came in pretty close when we tallied up all the numbers</p>
      <p begin="0:04:15.35" end="0:04:18.84">in terms of total damages and so forth.</p>
      <p begin="0:04:18.84" end="0:04:25.88">To create this scenario, the ShakeOut Earthquake, we <br/>defined the source of the earthquake in a lot of detail.</p>
      <p begin="0:04:25.88" end="0:04:33.79">So the science that went into that basically involved <br/>decades of study, trenching to look at offset layers that</p>
      <p begin="0:04:33.79" end="0:04:40.27">have been disturbed in previous earthquakes and then dating <br/>those using radio carbon. So that was the effort of USGS</p>
      <p begin="0:04:40.27" end="0:04:46.13">and our colleagues to the Southern California Earthquake <br/>Center over a long period of time, a lot of studies.</p>
      <p begin="0:04:46.13" end="0:04:52.41">And also the USGS funded a special project of the Southern <br/>California Earthquake Center called SoSAFE which stands for</p>
      <p begin="0:04:52.41" end="0:04:58.81">Southern San Andreas Fault Evaluation. So the SoSAFE project, <br/>we really are trying to make Southern California safer for</p>
      <p begin="0:04:58.81" end="0:05:04.87">the residence here. So one way that we've had some impact <br/>already with that project is in helping to define the</p>
      <p begin="0:05:04.87" end="0:05:11.53">earthquake source. The endpoints were selected based on <br/>pre-historic earthquake evidence. Also we ended at the northwest</p>
      <p begin="0:05:11.53" end="0:05:18.03">end because we had seen that in the previous 3 earthquakes, <br/>there have been a large slit down to Lake Hughes.</p>
      <p begin="0:05:18.03" end="0:05:26.03">But then from Lake Hughes to the southeast, <br/>there had been a lot less slit.</p>
      <p begin="0:05:26.03" end="0:05:29.17">So our sense is that this is the section of the fault that <br/>we have rupturing in the ShakeOut Scenario that has the most</p>
      <p begin="0:05:29.17" end="0:05:35.75">strain loaded on it. So it was that accumulative evidence <br/>from the scientific literature that we put into this. And</p>
      <p begin="0:05:35.75" end="0:05:42.03">then we also had scientific workshops where we consider this <br/>and with our colleagues, developed this scenario and then</p>
      <p begin="0:05:42.03" end="0:05:49.61">we vetted that through a process of interaction with our <br/>colleagues. State California Geological Survey also was</p>
      <p begin="0:05:49.61" end="0:06:00.71">vital and helping to form that image of the ShakeOut Earthquake.</p>
    </div>
  </body>
</tt>
