USGS Multimedia Gallery
|
This text will be replaced
To embed this video, click "menu" on the video player toolbar. If no transcript and/or closed-caption is available, please notify us.
[Music playing]
Paul: It was actually two years ago when we started meeting and forming this organization of the exact structure and the people to staff it had not yet fully worked out, and the district consultant was just in the process of putting their plan together and contributing just tons and tons and tons of management data that was broken down by watershed. Faith: And the areas or whatever… Paul: Right, the areas that, the watersheds that we're working in now. I think the biggest step that this group is taking is that we've acknowledged that the watersheds don't know any governmental boundaries and so, we're crossing those boundaries, and we're taking it as, what is contributing to the river's pollution, not just from a community or one arbitrary manmade boundary, but the natural boundary itself. And that's what that's been…just monumental to take that approach. So now we've got people on the ground, people that live in those areas and know the areas and can help identify where pollution has the potential of coming from or it's definitely coming from and that's going to help us target these projects that we're now two years into the process now. We recognize what the water quality issues are from the previous study, and now we can go into those watersheds and identify what the problem is. And that targets the public's money. It's a better use of the government money. So hoping we get some meaningful and most important, measurable results out of doing those projects. I see water quality benefit, chemistry benefit, habitat benefit, and recreational-use benefit. Faith: Have you seen with the citizens that live nearby the river, do they have more of an ownership as the process is developed, do you see that kind of growing or awareness that they have this resource that maybe they can take advantage of more in terms of whether is recreation or just tying in more to that? Paul: It's been an interesting mixed of folks that have come to these meetings. Many of them have their own motivations. The fishing group wants to see habitat improved. The canoe and kayak group would like to see access and recreational and… Faith: It's a big topic on the Menomonee? Paul: Very big, very well utilized. And then, there's the local residents that just want to see improvement in the overall, what's the right word, I guess the local residents just want to see a beautification of that area that affects their own property values. A lot of senior citizens have been very active in helping out and volunteering. It's been a great mix. Faith: It sounds like you have a great group down there. Paul: Yes, we do. We do. And some of the communities are more invested in the process as well. It's good to see them get involved. We get a lot of support. Faith: Do you at GRAEF, are you the facilitators also for coordination for activities or how does that work or is that yet to be developed as you get into the plan more? Paul: At this point, it's not a paid position. We're volunteers like everybody else but the local residents bring their local anecdotal accounts and knowledge of the area. We have some technical experts that can help make that contribution and the decisions of projects and what not. It's a mix of everybody helping out. So far, we're on a voluntary basis. We support the cause, we support the organization, and we see good things coming out of it. Faith: Do you do as far as like the data that gets collected and stuff, is that done through counties…keep track of that, within their systems or, I was thinking like as, any kind of monitoring data…? Paul: The MMSD right now has extensive monitoring in place and more going in and some of it can be accessed online in real time which is just tremendous. But they've been the impetus of giving them measurable results and the measurable status where we are right now. And that's the criteria that'll be used in the future as well. We run a real wide gamut, I think you just heard in the meeting that there's parts of the Menomonee that are, have very sensitive, and developed habitat and ecosystems. Faith: Yes, protection types. Paul: Protection type measures and then there's other ends of it that are just metal sheet pile wall lined, and totally urbanized. So it does really come down to this sub-watershed. Each individual area has to be judged on kind of its own merits. It's not a one size fits all. Faith: And wondering what's happening in there, in that particular area? Paul: Right. That's why is so important to take each section on its own. Get the people within that area to contribute as to where the most benefit can come from. Faith: Yes, and then they also get the buy-in and can see the benefit side of it of those benefits. That's neat. Paul: It's neat. I grew up around the Menomonee. I grew up in Wauwatosa and we had quite a bit of discussion tonight already about areas of Wauwatosa. And so I got a little bit invested, a little bit skin in the game, I'm on this one too; so it's not just where where I work. Faith: The only other watershed plan, I've been involved in some forested areas in the northern part of the state, I know that everybody's been doing their watershed plans across the state. Just the complexity of this one, and all the entities involved is pretty daunting. Paul: It is. I think… Faith: And then all the issues. Paul: I was going to Wauwatosa West High School when we had our first, was it ecology day, which is right along the Menomonee and Wauwatosa, on Seventh Street. And now we're reaching out to businesses and asking them, would you please adopt part of the river or take on a particular action and make a contribution, a volunteer contribution. There are a lot of businesses that are environmentally minded or want to make a claim that they're a green company and that type of thing and contribute. So, I'm hoping that we're going to get some good response out of the business community as well. Faith: That's a good resource. [Music playing] [End of Audio] |
DetailsTitle: Making Watershed Action Teams Successful Description: Faith Fitzpatrick (U.S. Geological Survey) and Paul Lohmiller (GRAEF-USA, Inc.) talk about the communities and groups that make up the successful Menomonee River Action team in Milwaukee, Wis. Location: Milwaukee, WI, USA Date Taken: 11/16/2010 Length: 7:08 Video Producer: Douglas A. Harned , National Water-Quality Assessment Program (NAWQA), USGS, North Carolina Water Science Center, Raleigh, NC Note: This video has been released into the public domain by the U.S. Geological Survey for use in its entirety. Some videos may contain pieces of copyrighted material. If you wish to use a portion of the video for any purpose, other than for resharing/reposting the video in its entirety, please contact the Video Producer/Videographer listed with this video. Please refer to the USGS Copyright section for how to credit this video. Additional Video Credits: Faith Fitzpatrick: Scriptwriter, Narrator, Scientist Consultant Gerard McMahon: Producer Douglas Harned: Producer, Video, Editor Alan Cressler: Video Luke McMahon: Video Paul Lohmiller (GRAEF-USA, Inc.) File Details: Suggest an update to the information/tags? Tags: |
* DOI and USGS link and privacy policies apply.