USGS Multimedia Gallery
|
This text will be replaced
To embed this video, click "menu" on the video player toolbar. If no transcript and/or closed-caption is available, please notify us.
[Music playing]
Faith: Karla, could you tell us a little bit about the bioengineering techniques that have been used on this site? Karla: Absolutely. One of the goals we've had from the very beginning with our first stream relocation is we wanted to make them look as natural as they would in nature and yet stabilize them because they're new and because they're not vegetated yet. So what we did in our first relocation is we were already into construction, and we realized later on during construction that we needed more stream bank stabilization. And the contractor came up with the idea that he was going to bring in a lot of really heavy riprap, so that was not only gonna be expensive, but that really wasn't the look that we were going for. And I remembered years ago we had started to use biologs. So we decided to bring them in, and we used them on our first project to start stabilizing stream banks, and that's turned out to be one of our greatest tools. And we use them and they work great. What happens is over time they start to vegetate and they stay in place and they do provide the stability that we're looking for. In addition to that we use this natural, it's like coconut weed fiber matting, and there's two reasons we really like that. It's natural. It doesn't have netting, and for little critters like little amphibians or even with any kind of snakes or birds they don't get tangled in that like they do with some of the plastic. So when you're in a more sensitive natural area, we always use this netting. It has a lot more give, so they don't get caught in there, and also, what you can do is you can see here we use a lot of rootstock plantings, and a lot of our stream bed and along the channel and sometimes a little further up, depending on the degree of inundation on the channel. But, what we do is we cut holes in this matting and we put the rootstock in there, and what happens then is when the rootstock starts to expand, the matting gives. So it isn't like some of the other tighter mattings where it will actually constrict the rootstock so it can't just start to expand like we want it to. And in addition to that we have what we call our rootstock protection. We learned the hard way I think on one project that I replanted twice because we had planted the rootstock and then the geese showed up. And what they do is pull it out, they eat the little tubers, and all of a sudden the rootstock was all floating in the water. So we planted it again. The next time we went back, floating in the water, so we decided we were gonna have to figure something out to keep the geese from eating the rootstock before it gets rooted and established. So I had gone to a workshop years ago, and they had talked about potential staking, and this is actually another item that DOT uses on any project where we have rootstock. And you have this basing at the stakes, and what's critical to these is that not only that the stakes we set out where the geese can't reach in and grab the rootstock. But you also have it on the backside so that once the silk fencing would be down they can't also grab it from the other end. And you need these three layers of twine. The reason you really need that is so that goslings can't go under. The goslings go under, the parents follow, and then you also need the additional two heights. So like I said what we always try to do is incorporate as many natural biotech products as we can, and to keep it more natural and very critter friendly, which is one of my top priorities on any projects so. Faith: How does the maintenance work for projects like this, too? Do you have to come back so often and check things? Like, everything is in place now. Does somebody watch it and make sure that things stay in place? Karla: Well, we get wetland mitigation credits, and anytime we have wetland mitigation credits, we have to come out and monitor any of our wetlands. So we do that for a period of five years, so long after the contractor and everybody's gone, I'm still out here every year doing vegetative monitoring, doing maintenance or management of invasive species, and just checking on how everything is going. [Music playing] [End of Audio] |
DetailsTitle: Bioengineering techniques create natural-looking and functioning streams in urban headwater channels, Villa Man Creek, Wisconsin freeway reconstruction project Description: Faith Fitzpatrick (U.S. Geological Survey) and Karla Leithoff (Wisconsin Department of Transportation) talk about lessons learned for establishing critter-friendly bank vegetation in a stream relocation project. Location: WI, Villa Mann Creek, USA Date Taken: 11/17/2010 Length: 5:08 Video Producer: Douglas A. Harned , National Water-Quality Assessment Program (NAWQA), USGS, North Carolina Water Science Center, Raleigh, NC Note: This video has been released into the public domain by the U.S. Geological Survey for use in its entirety. Some videos may contain pieces of copyrighted material. If you wish to use a portion of the video for any purpose, other than for resharing/reposting the video in its entirety, please contact the Video Producer/Videographer listed with this video. Please refer to the USGS Copyright section for how to credit this video. Additional Video Credits: Faith Fitzpatrick: Scriptwriter, Narrator, Scientist Consultant Gerard McMahon: Producer Douglas Harned: Producer, Video, Editor Alan Cressler: Video Luke McMahon: Video Karla Leithoff (Wisconsin Department of Transportation) File Details: Suggest an update to the information/tags? Tags: |
* DOI and USGS link and privacy policies apply.